<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Switchyard Creative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://switchyardcreative.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://switchyardcreative.com</link>
	<description>Marketing, strategy, design, and development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on See What You Think of This One by Daniel Christopher</title>
		<link>http://switchyardcreative.com/blog/2011/06/see-what-you-think-of-this-one/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switchyardcreative.com/?p=916#comment-40</guid>
		<description>These are some great thoughts Thomas. I actually haven’t read the story of Avis and DBB. It sounds like they had a great relationship with their agency. I really do love the idea of only delivering work you are absolutely sold on. But I think the following two things must be present in spades in order for that to be realistic:

A budget that can support the agency fully realizing their concepts in-house. For me the main motivator of producing something quickly and “seeing what they think” is that the budgets I’ve worked with are just too small to warrant any experimentation. There just isn’t room to follow rabbit trails aren’t a sure thing.
Utter respect and trust that the agency will represent you in the best possible way. The respect that Avis has for DBB is clearly illustrated in #1 and #4:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“Avis will never know as much about advertising as DBB, and DBB will never know as much about the rent a car business as Avis.”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“To this end, Avis will approve or disapprove, not try to improve, ads which are submitted. Any changes suggested by Avis must be grounded on a material operating defect (a wrong uniform for example).”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Most clients I’ve met with just wouldn’t be comfortable with that much of a hands-off approach.

But in the end, I do think that you may have compared apples to oranges here with the 37signals quote. No matter what the budget size, 37signals strategy is the best for product development.  When you are launching a long-term software project, there is no rush to perfect it. You actually get more good press and PR by updating often. But when you are doing creative services and marketing, there is no room for launching something that’s not ready for prime time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some great thoughts Thomas. I actually haven’t read the story of Avis and DBB. It sounds like they had a great relationship with their agency. I really do love the idea of only delivering work you are absolutely sold on. But I think the following two things must be present in spades in order for that to be realistic:</p>
<p>A budget that can support the agency fully realizing their concepts in-house. For me the main motivator of producing something quickly and “seeing what they think” is that the budgets I’ve worked with are just too small to warrant any experimentation. There just isn’t room to follow rabbit trails aren’t a sure thing.<br />
Utter respect and trust that the agency will represent you in the best possible way. The respect that Avis has for DBB is clearly illustrated in #1 and #4:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“Avis will never know as much about advertising as DBB, and DBB will never know as much about the rent a car business as Avis.”
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
“To this end, Avis will approve or disapprove, not try to improve, ads which are submitted. Any changes suggested by Avis must be grounded on a material operating defect (a wrong uniform for example).”
</p></blockquote>
<p>Most clients I’ve met with just wouldn’t be comfortable with that much of a hands-off approach.</p>
<p>But in the end, I do think that you may have compared apples to oranges here with the 37signals quote. No matter what the budget size, 37signals strategy is the best for product development.  When you are launching a long-term software project, there is no rush to perfect it. You actually get more good press and PR by updating often. But when you are doing creative services and marketing, there is no room for launching something that’s not ready for prime time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sticks &amp; Stones by Tweets that mention Sticks &#38; Stones &#124; Switchyard Creative -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://switchyardcreative.com/case-studies/sticks-and-stones/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Sticks &#38; Stones &#124; Switchyard Creative -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syc.switchyardprojects.com/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shopify, Tobias Lütke. Tobias Lütke said: Really nice Shopify case study: http://switchyardcreative.com/case-studies/sticks-and-stones/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shopify, Tobias Lütke. Tobias Lütke said: Really nice Shopify case study: <a href="http://switchyardcreative.com/case-studies/sticks-and-stones/" rel="nofollow">http://switchyardcreative.com/case-studies/sticks-and-stones/</a> […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

